My
research paper was on Psychological treatments throughout history. It is hard
to find an argument within that field so decided that I would focus on one
particular treatment, Psychotropic drugs, which has become very commonly used
in our day and age. The primary naysayer to psychotropic drugs
would be someone who favors a more natural approach to mental health such as
with the use of herbs. In recent years the popularity of common herbal remedies
such as lavender, st. johns wort, and chamomile has exploded as an alternative
to the use of psychotropic drugs such as anti-anxiety drugs and
anti-depressants. These natural advocates would exaggerate the possible side
effects of certain drugs and their commonality and use this as a reason to not
take any psychoactive drugs at all. Since very little study has been done
concerning the empirical results of herbal treatments for mental disorders,
there is a large area for debate over which of these two options would be more
effect overall in their use as a treatment. Apothecary uses of herbs instead of
mainstream drugs have been done long before and consistently after the
introduction of psychotropic drugs such as lithium and valium. Because this
treatment is believed safer and less invasive than newer drugs on the market,
many would choose them as a preferred treatment.
Sonney this is a good subject. There are so many naysayers on this subject. I know so many people who have their minds literally 'set' on each way, apothecary and psychoactive. This is a great challenge
ReplyDelete